REVIEWER POLICY

The Journal of Clinical Prosthodontics and Implantology (J-CPI) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly publishing through a rigorous, fair, and unbiased peer-review process. Reviewers play a critical role in evaluating the scientific quality, originality, methodological soundness, and clinical relevance of submitted manuscripts. Their expert assessments help ensure that only high-quality research is published.

Role of Reviewers

Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and evidence-based evaluations that assist both the Editorial Board and the authors in improving the quality of manuscripts. Recommendations should be based solely on the academic merit, scientific validity, ethical compliance, and relevance of the research.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts received for review are confidential documents. Reviewers must not share, discuss, reproduce, or use any unpublished information contained in a manuscript for personal, academic, or commercial purposes.

Ethical Responsibilities

Reviewers should promptly inform the Editorial Office if they identify plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, image manipulation, ethical concerns, or any potential conflict of interest that may affect their impartial judgment.

Timeliness

Reviewers are requested to complete their evaluations within the specified review period. If they are unable to meet the deadline, they should notify the Editorial Office promptly so that alternative arrangements can be made.

Quality and Integrity

Journal of Clinical Prosthodontics and Implantology (J-CPI) values the expertise and dedication of its reviewers and recognizes their contribution to maintaining the integrity, credibility, and scientific excellence of the journal. The journal is committed to a transparent and ethical peer-review system that supports the advancement of research in prosthodontics and implantology.